Clinical Genetic Testing for Atrial Fibrillation: Are We There Yet?

Important progress has been made toward unravelling the complex genetics underlying atrial fibrillation (AF). Initial studies were aimed to identify monogenic causes; however, it has become increasingly clear that the most common predisposing genetic substrate for AF is polygenic. Despite intensive investigations, there is robust evidence for rare variants for only a limited number of genes and cases. Although the current yield for genetic testing in early onset AF might be modest, there is an increasing appreciation that genetic culprits for potentially life-threatening ventricular cardiomyopathies and channelopathies might initially present with AF. The potential clinical significance of this recognition is highlighted by evidence that suggests that identification of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic rare variant in a patient with early onset AF is associated with an increased risk of death. These findings suggest that it might be warranted to screen patients with early onset AF for these potentially more sinister cardiac conditions. Beyond facilitating the early identification of genetic culprits associated with potentially malignant phenotypes, insight into underlying AF genetic substrates might improve the selection of patients for existing therapies and guide the development of novel ones. Herein, we review the evidence that links genetic factors to AF, then discuss an approach to using genetic testing for early onset AF patients in the present context, and finally consider the potential value of genetic testing in the foreseeable future. Although further work might be necessary before recommending uniform integration of genetic testing in cases of early onset AF, ongoing research increasingly highlights its potential contributions to clinical care.

Atrial fibrillation progression after cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation: the CIRCA-DOSE trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a chronic progressive disorder. Persistent forms of AF are associated with increased rates of thromboembolism, heart failure, and death. Catheter ablation modifies the pathogenic mechanism of AF progression. No randomized studies have evaluated the impact of the ablation energy on progression to persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia. METHODS: Three hundred forty-six patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF were enrolled and randomly assigned to contact-force-guided RF ablation (CF-RF ablation, 115), 4 min cryoballoon ablation (CRYO-4, 115), or 2 min cryoballoon ablation (CRYO-2, 116). Implantable cardiac monitors placed at study entry were used for follow-up. The main outcome was the first episode of persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia. Secondary outcomes included atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and arrhythmia burden on the implantable monitor. RESULTS: At a median of 944.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 612.5-1104) days, 0 of 115 patients (0.0%) randomly assigned to CF-RF, 8 of 115 patients (7.0%) assigned to CRYO-4, and 5 of 116 patients (4.3%) assigned to CRYO-2 experienced an episode of persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia (P = .03). A documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia ≥30 s occurred in 56.5%, 53.9%, and 62.9% of those randomized to CF-RF, CRYO-4, and CRYO-2, respectively; P = .65. Compared with that of the pre-ablation monitoring period, AF burden was reduced by a median of 99.5% (IQR 94.0%, 100.0%) with CF-RF, 99.9% (IQR 93.3%-100.0%) with CRYO-4, and 99.1%% (IQR 87.0%-100.0%) with CRYO-2 (P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF using radiofrequency energy was associated with fewer patients developing persistent AF on follow-up.

Rationale and Design of the Randomized Bayesian Multicenter COME-TAVI Trial in Patients With a New Onset Left Bundle Branch Block.

Patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at risk of developing delayed high-degree atrioventricular block. Management of new-onset LBBB post-TAVI remains controversial. In the Comparison of a Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB After TAVI (COME-TAVI) trial, consenting patients with new-onset LBBB that persists on day 2 after TAVI, meeting exclusion/inclusion criteria, are randomized to an electrophysiological study (EPS)-guided approach or 30-day electrocardiographic monitoring. In the EPS-guided approach, patients with a His to ventricle (HV) interval ≥ 65 ms undergo permanent pacemaker implantation. Patients randomized to noninvasive monitoring receive a wearable continuous electrocardiographic recording and transmitting device for 30 days. Follow-up will be performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome designed to capture net clinical benefit. The endpoint incorporates major consequences of both strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVI, as follows: (i) sudden cardiac death; (ii) syncope; (iii) atrioventricular conduction disorder requiring a pacemaker (for a class I or IIa indication); and (iv) complications related to the pacemaker or EPS. The trial incorporates a Bayesian design with a noninformative prior, outcome-adaptive randomization (initially 1:1), and 2 prespecified interim analyses once 25% and 50% of the anticipated number of primary endpoints are reached. The trial is event-driven, with an anticipated upper limit of 452 patients required to reach 77 primary outcome events over 12 months of follow-up. In summary, the aim of this Bayesian multicentre randomized trial is to compare 2 management strategies in patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVI-an EPS-guided approach vs noninvasive 30-day monitoring. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.

Les patients chez qui un bloc de branche gauche (BBG) est récemment apparu à la suite de l'implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter (IVAC) présentent un risque de bloc auriculoventriculaire de haut degré tardif. La prise en charge d'un BBG récemment apparu après une IVAC demeure controversée. Dans le cadre de l'essai COME-TAVI (Comparison of a ClinicalMonitoring Strategy VersusElectrophysiology-Guided Algorithmic Approach in Patients With a New LBBB AfterTAVI, ou comparaison d'une stratégie de surveillance clinique, par rapport à une approche guidée par étude électrophysiologique et fondée sur un algorithme, chez des patients présentant un BBG d'apparition récente à la suite d'une IVAC), des patients qui présentent un BBG d'apparition récente persistant le 2e jour après une IVAC, qui répondent aux critères d'admissibilité et qui ont donné leur consentement sont répartis aléatoirement pour être suivis à l'aide d'une approche guidée par une étude électrophysiologique (EEP) ou faire l'objet d'une surveillance électrocardiographique d'une durée de 30 jours. Un stimulateur cardiaque est implanté chez les patients du groupe de l'EEP dont l'intervalle HV (temps de conduction dans le tronc du faisceau de His jusqu'aux ventricules) est ≥ 65 ms. Les patients du groupe de surveillance non invasive reçoivent un dispositif portable d'enregistrement et de transmission continue de données électrocardiographiques pour une période de 30 jours. Le suivi sera réalisé aux 3e, 6e et 12e mois. Le critère d'évaluation principal est un paramètre composite conçu afin de saisir le bienfait clinique net. Il comprend les conséquences majeures des deux stratégies chez les patients présentant un BBG d'apparition récente après une IVAC, comme suit : (i) mort subite d'origine cardiaque; (ii) syncope; (iii) trouble de la conduction auriculoventriculaire nécessitant la pose d'un stimulateur cardiaque (pour une indication de classe I ou IIa); et (iv) complications relatives au stimulateur cardiaque ou à l'EEP. L'essai intègre une conception bayésienne avec une répartition aléatoire (dans un rapport initial de 1:1) antérieure non informative adaptée aux résultats et deux analyses intermédiaires définies au préalable lorsque 25 % et 50 % du nombre anticipé des critères d'évaluation principaux seront atteints. L'essai est axé sur les événements, et la limite supérieure anticipée pour atteindre 77 événements relatifs aux critères d'évaluation principaux sur 12 mois de suivi est de 452 patients. En résumé, l'objectif de cet essai bayésien multicentrique à répartition aléatoire est de comparer deux stratégies de prise en charge de patients présentant un BBG d'apparition récente après une IVAC, soit une approche guidée par une EEP, par rapport à une surveillance non invasive de 30 jours. Trial registration number: NCT03303612.

Epicardial connections and bi-atrial tachycardias: From anatomy to clinical practice.

Bi-atrial tachycardia (BiAT) is not rare after extensive atrial ablation or cardiac surgery. The complexity of bi-atrial reentrant circuits poses a great challenge for clinical practice. With recent advances in mapping technologies, we are now able to characterize atrial activation in detail. However, given the involvement of both atria and multiple epicardial conductions, endocardial mapping for BiATs is not easy to understand. Knowledge of the atrial myocardial architecture is the foundation for the clinical management of BiATs; as it is required to understand the possible mechanism of the tachycardia and identify the optimal target of ablation. In this review we summarize current knowledge about the anatomy of interatrial connections as well as other epicardial fibers and discuss the interpretation of electrophysiological findings and ablation strategies for BiATs.

Assessment and management of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac dysrhythmia encountered in practice. It is currently estimated that AF affects approximately 2% of the general population; however, the true prevalence of AF is likely to be at least 3%-4% when asymptomatic AF is considered. For clinically apparent AF, the investigations and management are relatively well established. The identification of minimally symptomatic patients is challenging, and furthermore, the optimal management is less certain. Although there is some debate about the ideal treatment pathway for asymptomatic AF, in most cases, the investigations and comprehensive management follow the same recommendations as clinically apparent AF. In contrast, beyond risk factor optimisation, the ideal management of subclinical or device-detected AF remains undefined. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the assessment and management of asymptomatic AF.

Procedure-Related Complications of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a commonly performed procedure. However, it is associated with potentially significant complications. Reported procedure-related complication rates are highly variable, depending in part on study design. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to determine the rate of procedure-related complications associated with catheter ablation of AF using data from randomized control trials and to assess temporal trends. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 2013 to September 2022 for randomized control trials that included patients undergoing a first ablation procedure of AF using either radiofrequency or cryoballoon (PROSPERO, CRD42022370273). RESULTS: A total of 1,468 references were retrieved, of which 89 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 15,701 patients were included in the current analysis. Overall and severe procedure-related complication rates were 4.51% (95% CI: 3.76%-5.32%) and 2.44% (95% CI: 1.98%-2.93%), respectively. Vascular complications were the most frequent type of complication (1.31%). The next most common complications were pericardial effusion/tamponade (0.78%) and stroke/transient ischemic attack (0.17%). The procedure-related complication rate during the most recent 5-year period of publication was significantly lower than during the earlier 5-year period (3.77% vs 5.31%; P = 0.043). The pooled mortality rate was stable over the 2 time periods (0.06% vs 0.05%; P = 0.892). There was no significant difference in complication rate according to pattern of AF, ablation modality, or ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation. CONCLUSIONS: Procedure-related complications and mortality rates associated with catheter ablation of AF are low and have declined in the past decade.

Approach to atrial fibrillation: Essentials for primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To support family physicians in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients at risk and in identifying and managing those with established AF; and to summarize key recommendations for ideal screening and care of patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society comprehensive guidelines for the management of AF, based on current evidence and clinical experience related to AF. MAIN MESSAGE: Atrial fibrillation, which is estimated to affect at least 500,000 Canadians, is associated with high risks of stroke, heart failure, and death. Primary care clinicians occupy a central role in the management of this chronic condition, focusing on the challenges of preventing AF and identifying, diagnosing, treating, and following patients with AF. Evidence-based guidelines that provide optimal management strategies have been published by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society to assist in these tasks. Messages critical to primary care are offered to support effective knowledge translation. CONCLUSION: Most patients with AF can be managed effectively in primary care. Family physicians not only play an important role in ensuring patients with AF receive timely diagnoses, but they are also key to providing initial and ongoing care, especially in patients with comorbid conditions.

Recurrences of Atrial Fibrillation Despite Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The PARTY-PVI Study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are mainly due to pulmonary vein reconnection. However, a growing number of patients have AF recurrences despite durable PVI. The optimal ablative strategy for these patients is unknown. We analyzed the impact of current ablation strategies in a large multicenter study. METHODS: Patients undergoing a redo ablation for AF and presenting durable PVI were included. The freedom from atrial arrhythmia after pulmonary vein-based, linear-based, electrogram-based, and trigger-based ablation strategies were compared. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, 367 patients (67% men, 63±10 years, 44% paroxysmal) underwent a redo ablation for AF recurrences despite durable PVI at 39 centers. After durable PVI was confirmed, linear-based ablation was performed in 219 (60%) patients, electrogram-based ablation in 168 (45%) patients, trigger-based ablation in 101 (27%) patients, and pulmonary vein-based ablation in 56 (15%) patients. Seven patients (2%) did not undergo any additional ablation during the redo procedure. After 22±19 months of follow-up, 122 (33%) and 159 (43%) patients had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at 12 and 24 months, respectively. No significant difference in arrhythmia-free survival was observed between the different ablation strategies. Left atrial dilatation was the only independent factor associated with arrhythmia-free survival (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.13-2.23]; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent AF despite durable PVI, no ablation strategy used alone or in combination during the redo procedure appears to be superior in improving arrhythmia-free survival. Left atrial size is a significant predictor of ablation outcome in this population.

Progression of Atrial Fibrillation after Cryoablation or Drug Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a chronic, progressive disorder, and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation are associated with increased risks of thromboembolism and heart failure. Catheter ablation as initial therapy may modify the pathogenic mechanism of atrial fibrillation and alter progression to persistent atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We report the 3-year follow-up of patients with paroxysmal, untreated atrial fibrillation who were enrolled in a trial in which they had been randomly assigned to undergo initial rhythm-control therapy with cryoballoon ablation or to receive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. All the patients had implantable loop recorders placed at the time of trial entry, and evaluation was conducted by means of downloaded daily recordings and in-person visits every 6 months. Data regarding the first episode of persistent atrial fibrillation (lasting ≥7 days or lasting 48 hours to 7 days but requiring cardioversion for termination), recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (defined as atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds), the burden of atrial fibrillation (percentage of time in atrial fibrillation), quality-of-life metrics, health care utilization, and safety were collected. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were enrolled, with 154 patients assigned to undergo initial rhythm-control therapy with cryoballoon ablation and 149 assigned to receive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Over 36 months of follow-up, 3 patients (1.9%) in the ablation group had an episode of persistent atrial fibrillation, as compared with 11 patients (7.4%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.70). Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia occurred in 87 patients in the ablation group (56.5%) and in 115 in the antiarrhythmic drug group (77.2%) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67). The median percentage of time in atrial fibrillation was 0.00% (interquartile range, 0.00 to 0.12) in the ablation group and 0.24% (interquartile range, 0.01 to 0.94) in the antiarrhythmic drug group. At 3 years, 8 patients (5.2%) in the ablation group and 25 (16.8%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group had been hospitalized (relative risk, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.66). Serious adverse events occurred in 7 patients (4.5%) in the ablation group and in 15 (10.1%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group. CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with catheter cryoballoon ablation was associated with a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation or recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia over 3 years of follow-up than initial use of antiarrhythmic drugs. (Funded by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Network of Canada and others; EARLY-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02825979.).

Healthcare utilization and quality of life for atrial fibrillation burden: the CIRCA-DOSE study.

AIMS: Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence ≥30 s remains the primary endpoint of clinical trials; however, this definition has not been correlated with clinical outcomes or pathophysiological processes. This study sought to determine the atrial tachyarrhythmia duration and burden associated with meaningful clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The time and duration of every atrial tachyarrhythmia episode recorded on implantable cardiac monitor were evaluated. Healthcare utilization and quality of life in the year following ablation were prospectively collected. Three hundred and forty-six patients provided 126 110 monitoring days. One-year freedom from recurrence increased with arrhythmia duration thresholds, from 52.6 (182/346) to 93.3% (323/346; P < 0.0001). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence limited to durations ≤1 h had rates of healthcare utilization comparable with patients free of recurrence, while patients with AF recurrences lasting >1 h had a relative risk for emergency department consultation of 3.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-5.3], hospitalization of 5.3 (95% CI 2.9-9.6), and repeat ablation of 27.1 (95% CI 10.5-71.0). Patients with AF burden of ≤0.1% had rates of healthcare utilization comparable with patients free of recurrence, while patients with AF burden of >0.1% had a relative risk for emergency department consultation of 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-3.9), hospitalization of 6.8 (95% CI 3.6-13.0), cardioversion of 9.1 (95% CI 3.3-25.6), and repeat ablation of 21.8 (95% CI 9.2-52.2). Compared with patients free of recurrence, the disease-specific quality of life was significantly impaired with AF episode durations >24 h, or AF burdens >0.1%. CONCLUSION: AF recurrence, as defined by 30 s of arrhythmia, lacks clinical relevance. AF episode durations >1 h or burdens >0.1% were associated with increased rates of healthcare utilization.

Integration of 3D nuclear imaging in 3D mapping system for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with implanted devices: Perfusion/voltage retrospective assessment of scar location.

Background: The identification of low-voltage proarrhythmic areas for catheter ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains challenging. Integration of myocardial perfusion imaging (single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography; SPECT/CT) and electroanatomical mapping (EAM) may improve delineation of the arrhythmogenic substrate. Objective: To assess the feasibility of SPECT/CT image integration with voltage maps using the EnSite Precision system (Abbott) in patients undergoing scar-mediated VT ablation. Methods: Patients underwent SPECT/CT imaging prior to left ventricular (LV) EAM with the EnSite Precision mapping system. The SPECT/CT, EAM data, and ablation lesions were retrospectively co-registered in the EnSite Precision system and exported for analysis. Segmental tissue viability scores were calculated based on SPECT/CT perfusion and electrogram bipolar voltage amplitude. Concordance, specificity, and sensitivity between the 2 modalities as well as the impact of SPECT/CT spatial resolution were evaluated. Results: Twenty subjects (95% male, 67 ± 7 years old, left ventricular ejection fraction 36% ± 11%) underwent EAM and SPECT/CT integration. A concordance of 70% was found between EAM and SPECT/CT for identification of cardiac segments as scar vs viable, with EAM showing a 68.5% sensitivity and 76.4% specificity when using SPECT/CT as a gold standard. Projection on low-resolution 3D geometries led to an average decrease of 38% ± 22% of the voltage points used. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of integrating SPECT/CT with EAM performed retrospectively for characterization of anatomical substrates during VT ablation procedures.

Cryoablation as a first-line therapy for atrial fibrillation: current status and future prospects.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common chronic and progressive heart rhythm disorder. For those in whom sinus rhythm is desired, contemporary clinical practice guidelines recommend antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as the initial therapy. However, these medications have modest efficacy and are associated with significant adverse effects. AREAS COVERED: The current article reviews the evidence surrounding first-line catheter ablation, particularly the emerging evidence surrounding the use of cryoballoon ablation as a first-line therapy. The focus of the review is on the outcomes of arrhythmia freedom, quality of life, health-care utilization, and safety. In addition, the article will review novel cryoablation systems. EXPERT OPINION: Recent evidence suggests that cryoballoon ablation significantly improves arrhythmia outcomes (e.g. freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia or symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia, reduction in arrhythmia burden), patient-reported outcomes (e.g. symptoms and quality of life), and health-care resource utilization (e.g. hospitalization), without increasing the risk of adverse events. These findings are relevant to patients, providers, and health-care systems, as they help inform the decision-making regarding the initial choice of rhythm-control therapy in patients with treatment-naive AF.

Characterization of arrhythmia substrate to ablate persistent atrial fibrillation (COAST-AF): Randomized controlled trial design and rationale.

BACKGROUND: Atrial low voltage area (LVA) catheter ablation has emerged as a promising strategy for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear if catheter ablation of atrial LVA increases treatment success rates in patients with persistent AF. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this trial is to assess the potential benefit of adjunctive catheter ablation of atrial LVA in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent AF, when compared to PVI alone. The secondary aims are to evaluate safety outcomes, the quality of life and the healthcare resource utilization. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, 2-arm, single-blinded randomized controlled trial is under way (NCT03347227). Patients who are candidates for catheter ablation for persistent AF will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either PVI alone or PVI + atrial LVA ablation. The primary outcome is 18-month documented event rate of atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter) post catheter ablation. Secondary outcomes include procedure-related complications, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months, AF burden, need for emergency department visits/hospitalization, need for repeat ablation for atrial arrhythmia, quality of life at 12 and 18 months, ablation time, and procedure duration. DISCUSSION: Characterization of Arrhythmia Mechanism to Ablate Atrial Fibrillation (COAST-AF) is a multicenter randomized trial evaluating ablation strategies for catheter ablation. We hypothesize that catheter ablation of atrial LVA in addition to PVI will result in higher procedural success rates when compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent AF.